How Past Crimes Can Be Used Against You
Having a past criminal record can significantly influence the outcome of a present case, even if the new charges seem unrelated to the previous offenses. This issue becomes even more complex when the past record involves serious charges, such as sexual offenses, and is coupled with the long-term consequences of being a registered sex offender. In the legal system, a past conviction can act as a double-edged sword, where it not only informs how you are perceived but can also impact the legal strategies you need to pursue.
If you have been charged with a crime in Ohio, and you have a prior conviction on your record, it is important to reach out to a criminal defense lawyer near you who has experience with cases for individuals who have been previous charged and convicted of a crime. Call the Joslyn Law Firm today for a free case consultation. (614) 444-1900
Can a Prosecutor Bring Up Past Charges?
Yes. Prior convictions can sometimes be used in court. Their admissibility depends on the circumstances.
When Can Past Convictions Be Used
-
To challenge credibility: If a defendant or witness testifies, their prior convictions may be introduced to impeach their credibility — especially if the prior conviction was a felony or involved dishonesty or false statements.
-
At sentencing: If the defendant is convicted, a judge will often consider their criminal history when calculating sentence. A prior record can lead to harsher penalties or greater consequences.
-
For relevant issues: In limited cases, a prior conviction may be admissible if it is directly relevant to a specific issue in the current case — for example, showing a certain pattern or motive, or method of operation.
When Can Past Convictions Generally Not Be Used
-
Not to prove guilt: Prior convictions cannot simply be used to argue “because this person committed crimes before, they must be guilty now.” Using past convictions to show propensity or bad character is typically barred.
-
Old or pardoned convictions: Evidence of a conviction that is more than ten years old often faces stricter admissibility standards. Also if a conviction was pardoned, annulled, expunged, or a certificate of rehabilitation issued, it may be barred from use.
What This Means for Defendants
Because prior convictions may or may not be admissible depending on the situation, it is critical to have experienced defense counsel. A skilled defense attorney can challenge attempts to introduce past convictions if they are irrelevant, prejudicial, or too remote in time.
Recent Case Example of Prior Conviction
In a recent case, our client was a 19-year-old man who was facing allegations that, at first glance, seemed relatively straightforward. He had a sexual encounter with a 14-year-old girl who had lied about her age. Even her mother initially put the blame on her daughter’s behavior and actions. However, once his prior record as a juvenile sex offender become disclosed it complicated matters significantly.
The Burden of a Past Conviction
In this case, our client had a juvenile conviction for a sex offense, committed when he was 15. He had completed his legal obligations as a juvenile offender, including registration as a sex offender, but as an adult, he found himself entangled in a new allegation. While the facts of the current case seemed clear, he had no clear knowledge that the girl was underage, his prior record loomed large.
The reality is that when someone has a prior conviction, especially for a sensitive issue like a sex offense, it’s easy for prosecutors to leverage that against them. This is especially true when the new case involves a young victim or any situation where sexual behavior is questioned. Prosecutors may argue that the defendant “should have known better” due to their past conviction, even if the facts of the new case do not suggest intentional wrongdoing.
The Emotional Impact of a Past Record on Jurors
Jurors are often unfamiliar with the legal nuances of past convictions, and tend to form strong emotional opinions based on what they hear. In the case of a registered sex offender, the jury may already come with biases, regardless of the current case’s facts. Once a juror learns that the defendant has a history of sex-related offenses, they may automatically associate them with a heightened level of guilt or culpability.
When presenting such a case, the defense must tread carefully. Jurors may become emotionally influenced by the defendant’s past, leading them to overlook key facts or misinterpret the evidence at hand. This can result in unfair judgments and a lack of sympathy, even when the present case doesn’t directly support the charges. It may even be advised in these cases to request a bench trial to be decided by a judge instead of a jury trial to avoid the emotional biases that a jury could have, as judges are generally more focused on the legal aspects of the case and less likely to be influenced by the emotional nature of sexual offense allegations.
Prosecutors will often use a defendant’s past criminal history strategically. They may argue that a prior conviction demonstrates a pattern of behavior, attempting to draw a connection between the defendant’s past actions and the current charges. This is particularly relevant in cases involving accusations of sexual misconduct or assault.
In this case, the prosecution could have tried to use the defendant’s previous juvenile sex offense to argue that he was predisposed to sexual misconduct. Although the facts of the current case indicated that the client had not knowingly committed any crime since the girl lied about her age, the prosecution could attempt to paint him as someone who would have intentionally ignored the girl’s age. The presence of a past conviction helps to fuel such arguments, giving them more weight than they deserve.
The Challenge of Jury Bias with Prior Convictions
The greatest challenge in cases involving individuals with prior criminal records is the jury’s ability to remain objective. Once jurors hear about a past conviction, especially one related to sexual misconduct, it can be challenging for them to compartmentalize that information and focus solely on the present case. In a jury trial in Ohio, their biases may cloud their judgment, leading them to view the defendant through the lens of their past offenses.
This emotional reaction is why we emphasize the importance of focusing on the facts of the current case while minimizing the emotional pull of past actions. In this instance, we worked diligently with the client to present the case without allowing his prior conviction to overshadow the facts at hand. Instead, we focused on demonstrating that the client did not have clear evidence or reasons to know the girl’s age, and that there was no intention of wrongdoing.
Mitigating the Impact of a Past Conviction
To mitigate the impact of a prior conviction, the defense team needs to present the defendant in the best light possible. This includes showcasing their rehabilitation and current lifestyle, which can demonstrate that they are not the same person they were when the prior offense occurred. For this client, we focused on his positive changes since his juvenile conviction, he was attending counseling and making efforts to turn his life around.
Additionally, we worked to exclude any mention of the prior offense during the trial, unless absolutely necessary. This tactic is critical in preventing jurors from becoming fixated on the past and instead keeping their attention on the present case. However, despite efforts to exclude the past conviction, there’s always the risk that the prosecution could introduce it into evidence, especially if they can make the argument that it’s relevant to the case at hand.
The Importance of Good Legal Strategy When You Have Prior Convictions
When dealing with a defendant who has a past record, the legal strategy must be tailored to account for the extra baggage of that history. As in the case above, the key was presenting a defense that emphasized the lack of intent and the absence of evidence that the client knew the victim was underage. In situations like this, it’s crucial to focus on the legal issues at hand, whether the defendant should have known the victim’s age, and not allow the prior record to overshadow those points.
Sometimes, it’s also necessary to negotiate with the prosecution, especially if the case involves a potential plea deal. In this instance, the prosecutor made an offer that would have allowed the client to avoid a felony conviction, but the impact of the past record was still present. The defense has to weigh the risk of going to trial, where the jury may be swayed by the past conviction, against the certainty of accepting a plea deal to minimize the long-term consequences.
Speak With an Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer If You Have Been Charged and Have a Past Record
A past criminal record, especially one that involves a sex offense, will always have an impact on various aspects of a present case. It can shape how the prosecution builds its case, and it can also negatively affect how jurors perceive the defendant. The challenge for the defense is to ensure that the current case stands on its own merits, separate from the shadows of past mistakes. By focusing on the facts, presenting the client as a rehabilitated individual, and strategically managing the introduction of past offenses, it is possible to mitigate the negative influence of a prior record and achieve a favorable outcome.
In the end, the legal strategy in such cases is not just about defending against the charges at hand but also about managing the complexities of the defendant’s history to ensure they have a fair shot at justice. If you have been charged with a crime and have a past record, contact the Joslyn Law Firm today for a free case consultation. (614) 444-1900
